What a Narrowly Divided Senate Means for Health Policy
On January 5th, Reverend Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff defeated Senators Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue in the Georgia Senate run-off elections, respectively. Democrats narrowly winning both Georgia Senate seats also means Democrats have narrowly won the Senate, dividing seats 50-50 between members who caucus with Democrats and Republicans with Vice President-elect Harris empowered to cast any tie-breaking votes and handing the incoming Biden administration a unified government.
While those with lofty ambitions on policy and legislative issues are cheering, there’s good reason to consider the need for moderating what can be expected from the 117th Congress: Democrats aren’t always on agreement on major issues like direct payment amounts as part of COVID relief or Medicare For All. The Biden administration will likely need to rely heavily on the regulatory powers allowed to federal agencies – which makes the prospective appointment of Xavier Becerra to lead Health and Human Services make more sense than it perhaps did on the surface. After all, who appoints an attorney to lead a health care agency?
The Trump administration made dramatic regulatory moves with regard to health care, targeting non-discrimination rules in health care, the Affordable Care Act including attempting to get the legislation declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, drug pricing, and championed legislative changes eliminating individual mandate penalty. While a judge has already temporarily blocked Trumps’ effort to tie drug prices to that of other nations’ prices and the Supreme Court has given the green light to recently-revived Food and Drug Administration rules on abortion pill access, these issues are regulatory in nature. The Biden administration could simply choose not to defend these moves in court change these regulations. While state push back is likely, a lack of Congressional challenge against these moves may help smooth the way for institutional changes.
It’s largely expected that among Biden’s first moves regarding health care will include expanding COVID relief measures and vaccine distribution plans, rescind the Mexico City policy (also known as the “Global Gag Rule”), “expand[ing] access to high-quality health care for Lesbian, Gay, Biden, Transgender, and Queer+ individuals” (or moving quickly to rescind the “Provider Conscience” rule), and reversing the 23% rate cut to 340B entities. With the help of a unified House and Senate, among Biden’s first accomplishments may be a legislative “fix” to the Affordable Care Act challenge awaiting ruling from the Supreme Court. Other campaign promises from Biden include seeking legislation to end HIV criminalization and increasing research into harm reduction models, expanding syringe services programs, and substance treatment funding – an issue Biden has evolved on and largely due to bearing witness and supporting his son through.
Other moves to watch for:
Strengthening the Affordable Care Act:
- A regulatory move recalculating and increasing subsidies for Marketplace plans
- Restoring Marketplace Navigator funding
- Returning the open enrollment period to 90 days
- Rescinding a proposed rule on 1332 waivers allowing states to opt-out of the Marketplace
- Changes to regulations regarding short-term policies and association health plans (including reduced allowable coverage periods and requiring coverage of pre-existing conditions, including pregnancies, HIV, HCV, and transgender identity among others)
- Reduce documentation burden for subsidies and Special Enrollment Periods
- Expand the definition of qualifying life events and rules regarding special enrollment periods
- Enforce mental health and substance abuse coverage parity
Strengthening Medicaid:
- Rescind, reject, and stop defending 1115 waivers seeking work requirements
- Encourage 1115 waivers to include the impacts of increasing coverage
- Revise increased eligibility verification for Medicaid
- Encourage policies regarding presumptive eligibility outside of hospitalization and emergency situations
- Review and revise reimbursement schedules for Rural Hospitals
LGBTQ Health Equity:
- Issue guidance and seek funding to address mental health services and support staff in schools
- Reinstitute and/or strengthen Obama era guidance regarding transgender students and Title IX protections
- Revise and strengthen Affordable Care Act, Section 1557 non-discrimination rules protecting women, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer people, and people living with pre-existing conditions like HIV or HCV (in which the Trump administration would allow payers and providers to refuse care
- Rescind the Trump era ban on transgender people serving in the military
- Reverse or rescind Trump era “religious conscience” applying to civil rights laws – use regulatory power to include Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer people in civil rights protections in health, housing, and labor
- Expanding data collection policies to include sexual and gender identities
While some may view the heads of regulation making agencies as “unelected officials”, in many ways, who we elect to be the executive is very much choosing who leads the agencies that impact our lives on a daily basis. There is much work to do for the Biden administration on the regulatory front and unified, carefully crafted legislation speaking to these issues may well help cement these changes beyond political party ping pong.